Statement
Coronavirus has a recovery rate of 99.97% in anyone under 70 without underlying conditions. Moreover to achieve herd immunity in a population, only around 60% of the population need to have had a disease, after which they will have antibody and T-cell immunity which often provides lifelong protection from that disease.
UK government data shows that there have been some 9 million “positive cases” as of November 2021, while some 50 million people have had their first covid vaccination and some 45 million second and are therefore “double (formerly labelled “fully”) vaccinated ie. most of the population. What then would be the case for vaccine passports if most of the population has either natural immunity or are protected by the vaccines?
The UK HART Group says of vaccine certification (a vaccine passport would contain confidential medical information that should only be demanded in extreme circumstances) that it “is highly coercive, threatening the loss of livelihood and the loss of freedom of movement. That is in no sense ‘free’ consent as set out in The Nuremberg Code. Rather it is considerable duress.”
In a series of interviews, Belgian psychologist Mattias Desmet, discusses how governments have masterfully attached a sense of free-floating anxiety – due to the work and housing insecurity that has been created in the last decades – to the threat of coronavirus (and now “climate change”). He asks, “so, if you feel it’s justified to isolate people in their houses, to force pregnant women to wear masks, if you make all the people die alone and in isolation… why would you not take the next step to building a new camp so we could isolate the people who tested positively on the coronavirus? Typical of totalitarianism… a population is seized by a very simple and absurd logic… that makes them transgress all ethical limits as if there is no other option”.
